http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/2009/10/usb-communications-device-class-on-64-bit-windows/ The Original Sun, 23 May 2010 23:09:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/2009/10/usb-communications-device-class-on-64-bit-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-1224 Omar Sahid Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:05:01 +0000 http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/?p=118#comment-1224 Thanks bro!!! you save us!! Thanks bro!!! you save us!!

]]> http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/2009/10/usb-communications-device-class-on-64-bit-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-1192 Krister Renaud Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:26:31 +0000 http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/?p=118#comment-1192 I found this post interesting, but I would like to see the followup about signing the driver package or perhaps a link to some other resource with details on signing 64-bit packages utilizing built-in drivers. I found this post interesting, but I would like to see the followup about signing the driver package or perhaps a link to some other resource with details on signing 64-bit packages utilizing built-in drivers.

]]> http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/2009/10/usb-communications-device-class-on-64-bit-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-922 Liam Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:14:00 +0000 http://blogs.6bit.com/josh/?p=118#comment-922 This is cool - thanks for sharing this. I had one question - how did you decide to use the GUID_DEVINTERFACE_SERENUM_BUS_ENUMERATOR class instead of the GUID_DEVINTERFACE_COMPORT class? I'm just looking through the list at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms791134.aspx This is cool – thanks for sharing this. I had one question – how did you decide to use the GUID_DEVINTERFACE_SERENUM_BUS_ENUMERATOR class instead of the GUID_DEVINTERFACE_COMPORT class? I’m just looking through the list at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms791134.aspx

]]>